USMA — 100 Years Part III

Those Who Don’t Learn From History….

By The Metric Maven

The 21st century arrived on January 1st 2001, and after this temporal milestone passed, NASA looked into their lack of metric practice. The May-June issue of Metric Today quotes an Inspector General report: “NASA’s use of the metric system varies from program to program and from Center to Center.” The article noted that “NASA does not give program/project managers very much guidance for using the metric system.” If there was ever a more perfect example of the importance and need for a measurements coordinator position, with actual authority, I cannot think of one. Pat Naughtin emphasized the need for measurements coordinators, and I’ve written about my own experience with uncoordinated practice in industry.

The eight recommendations from the Inspector General to NASA are just more pablum which will change nothing. Number 6 begins: “NASA should show caution in granting SI waivers to entire programs. Use of SI within a `waivered` project project should be permitted, when appropriate.” SI should be “permitted”? Here is what should have been recommended: 1. NASA must have a mandatory transition to metric-only in two years from this date or face steep penalties. 2. All measurements for all projects must be approved by an office of measurement coordination and must be exclusively in metric, no exceptions, no waivers, no excuses.

Aerospace Week & Space Technology indicated that a law passed to reduce paperwork eliminated the requirement for all agencies to report metric progress. Waivers were no longer required. The magazines suggestion?—“…immediate restoration of the waiver process.” (MT May-June 2001)

The new millennium would not begin favorably for U.S. Metrication. Washington had become even more unresponsive when it concerned metric, which hardly seemed possible.

Metric and inch-pound mistakes continued to produce tragedy and loss. The July-August issue of Metric Today (MT) reported that the crash of Korean Air Cargo Flight 6316 occurred because of a metric-medieval unit confusion. The flight was to travel from Shanghai to Seoul.  The South Korea Ministry of Construction and Transportation determined that the crash was “due to a mix-up in the cockpit on whether the altitude should be measured in meters or feet. According to MT:

The accident took place soon after takeoff in Shanghai and killed 3 crew members, 5 people on the ground, and injured 40 construction personnel when it fell onto a construction site near the airport.

The summary of the report on the incident stated that a Chinese air controller directed the pilots to 1500 [assuming the pilots would know it meant 1500 meters], However, because the international aviation industry commonly measures altitude in feet, it is assumed the pilot concluded the McDonnell Douglas MD-11 was almost 1000 meters too high, so quickly moved to lower the plane. When he realized his error, it was not possible to correct the error in time, and the plane crashed.

Another metric setback occurred when Professional Engineer Thomas R. Warne, P.E. resigned his Utah DOT position, but not before announcing that Utah would revert to inch-pound medieval units for road construction in 12 months. From that point on all work will be done in Ye Olde English units. This reversal appears to have occurred throughout the nation.

The Metric Today issue of May-June 2002 had a face-lift by a graphic artist, courtesy of QSI corporation.

The subject of allowing metric-only packaging in the US continues to be discussed in Metric Today  to this day. No current pro-metric legislation is discussed, as there does not appear to be any. NIST continues to employ a metric coordinator, but their influence appears to be more ceremonial at this point than actual. A focus on metric education is a constant drum beat in Metric Today even as there is no perceptual change to metric in the US making it a virtual experience. All the measures of everyday life are given in Medieval Olde English Units. When metric dimensions do appear in MT, the centimeter pseudo-inch is utilized constantly. The world record eyebrow hair is touted as 9 centimeters (90 millimeters for those with a refined measurement sense) and belongs to Sardar Singh of Amritsar, India. If Metric Today itself has a policy concerning metric usage, the centimeter is still a sacred cow.

In the same issue (MT Sep-Oct-2003) it was noted that Pat Naughtin launched his email newsletter, Metrication Matters, on Jun 9th. Naughtin strongly argued for using millimeters as the common small metric unit. The Nov-Dec Metric Today contains a table with the prefix cluster around unity, and the same number of Medieval Olde English Units for comparison. Which only reinforces a perceived equality between the system and non-system which does not exist.

The issue of implementing a law that allows metric only labeling for goods across the country is a continuing topic. Metric changes in other countries are highlighted. In August of 2004 the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) decided to revert back to US units over a two year period.

Professional Engineer Robert Bullard P.E. attempted to begin metric construction in Florida. The local government officials refused to go along with metric drawings. I’ve written about his problems here, and in the end, he’s been compelled by “market forces” to go back to inch-pound designs.

The US hard metric conversion of masonry was overturned (MT Jan-Feb 2005):

The National Concrete Masonry Association (NCMA) announced in a 19 November 2004 press release that Congress has passed the Department of Energy High-End Computing Revitalization Act of 2004, which eliminates the requirement for hard metric concrete units in federal construction plans. The bill, expected to be signed into law by President [George W.] Bush, nixes the mandate for the use of round metric 200 x 200 x 400 mm concrete units, instead of soft-converted 203 x 203 x 406 mm units, in U.S. government construction.

The motivation for this rejection is enigmatic. The manufacturers would be putting less material into each brick, and probably charging the same amount of money.


A nostalgia for the 1970s metrication period begins to seep into the pages of Metric Today. The only new recurring metric issue is the need for a new definition of the Kilogram. The biggest news is not metric legislation from within the U.S. but pressure from Japan in 2006. Japan insisted that the U.S. Government “…ensure thorough adoption of the metric system in public and private sectors of the United States.” (MT May-Jun 2006). The European Union also began to insist on the U.S. providing metric only trade goods, but nothing would come from it. Metric meetings which had been so prevalent only a couple of decades before, were extinct.

From the time she became USMA president, Lorelle Young tirelessly traveled to Washington to lobby for metrication, and is prominent in Metric Today for constantly promoting metric. Unfortunately it is a never ending task in the U.S., which has reaped only irrational political push-back. One must admire her tenacity and drive in the face of overwhelming reactionary political opposition.

The current era appears, in my view, to be a retreat to the past. In the United States, only minute islands of metric exist within a sea of ancient US measures. New York state had converted to metric for road construction, then announced it would un-convert from metric in late 2006. Metric Today has a considerable number of column-millimeters which feature metric nostalgia, but no federal bills, pro or anti-metric, grace her pages. Why? Because they don’t exist. You will have a better chance of spotting Bigfoot on the House or Senate floor than pro-metric legislation.

NASA announced that its Constellation program was to be metric, and then later retracted that assertion.

Senator Clayborn Pell would die in 2009.

In 2009, metric signs along I-19 in Arizona began to feel the pressure from anti-metric forces. The signs had been placed there in 1979 while the US Metric Board existed. The I-19 Controversy continues and does not appear resolved.

The US Senate confirmed Dr. Patrick Gallagher as Director of NIST in 2009. As longtime readers know, he was the feckless Director who, in 2013, rebuffed the We The People Petition which requested that Congress make metric the exclusive measurement system of the US.

By 2010 The Federal Highway Administration issued a new manual of standards. The 2003 edition had dual-units; the 2009 has only inch-pound.

In 2013 an isolated metric legislative apparition appeared. MT reported:

On 17 January 2013 in the state of Hawaii, Representative Karl Rhoads, who represents Hawaii’s 28th House District, introduced a bill in the state legislature that would make the metric system the official system of measurement in Hawaii by the year 2018.

Why this legislation was introduced is a mystery. It was never passed.

In 2015 Lorelle Young stepped down as President of the USMA. There were immediate changes in Metric Today. The September-October issue contains a new tagline: Advocating the completion of U.S. conversion to the metric system. Had the old tagline remained, it would have informed the reader that 2016 was the USMA’s 100th year. It is hard to see the new tagline as anything other than a denial of the obvious: essentially there has been no beginning of a metric conversion in the United States. Advocating a completion of something which has not begun seems much like advocating that Liberia complete their quest to win the Super Bowl. I’m sure there must be a football team somewhere in Liberia, which means they have begun the process.

The writing found in the November-December Metric Today belies their tagline. USMA VP Paul Trusten has this to say (pp 3-4):

Even now, I feel almost as if I am acting in secret. What began as simple public ignorance has festered into a public prejudice similar to racial prejudice. …

So, with regard to completing US metrication, we have to take what may amount to a historically unique stance as both leaders and protesters. We are NOT underdogs. We are very much a part of the “Establishment,” the people who wield technology on a daily basis.

Martin Morrison, wrote a Metric Training and Education column that month which states:

There is an advantage in having US industry and media take the lead in metric conversion. When the government does things, all the naysayers rev up their anti-metric propaganda, much of which is factually false. When industry and media use metric by their own volition, there is essentially no resistance. Americans just accept it, or don’t even notice it. It just happens. In this context, I am very happy to see the US Metric Association’s new motto: “Advocating the Completion of US Conversion to the Metric System.” That nails it!

No Metric Philosopher has ever said it better. Despite the fact that we’ve had a voluntary metrication program “in place” since at least 1866, and re-emphasized in 1921, industry and the media continue to remain hostile to metric; I don’t see letting them “take the lead” as a viable or even rational position.

A country where the new USMA motto might make sense would be the UK. England is clearly very, very much metric, and should complete their conversion as they are well on their way. In the US, the metric system is but an abstraction that is only discussed when marginal candidates for President of the US mention it as a throw-away line, well into their speech. This metric statement is then used as a quick fear-fix for our media echo-chamber and the outrage junkies that jones for it. There is no metric conversion occurring in the US and (spoiler alert) there is no Santa Claus.

There are however several policies which have been embraced by the USMA which in my opinion do not help metric promotion. They are: 1. Referring to the inch-pound system. What we have in the US is in no way a system and in no way should this mess be equated with SI. Only the metric system is an integrated measurement system. US measures are literally medieval units  2. The encouragement of centimeters 3. The promotion of the prefix cluster around unity (hecto, deci, centi, deca). The absence of an open USMA policy advocating that any new metric legislation must be mandatory and not voluntary. 4. The promotion of metric to medieval conversions as a viable path to metric in the US. 5. The implied assertion that dual-unit dimensioning or packaging is progress toward metrication.

The USMA is celebrating its 100th year of metric promotion. Its centennial. Fredrick Halsey called the original organizers in the early twentieth century and said that he and other anti-metric people in the US had killed the metric system in 1905, and would kill it again in 1921. They were successful. Halsey’s successors have continued to make certain that no metric laws of any type are passed, let alone mandatory metric laws. I wish I could celebrate the fact that the US is so metric in 2016, that the need for the USMA had long passed, and there is no need for it to continue. Congratulations are in order for the USMA’s tenacity in the most hostile anti-metric Frozen Republic on the planet Earth.

If you liked this essay and wish to support the work of The Metric Maven, please visit his Patreon Page

11 thoughts on “USMA — 100 Years Part III

  1. What was the old tagline? You’ve got a misspelling of hostile in that sentence.

  2. Now more than ever, there is a need for a U.S. Metric Association. We will continue to shine our light in the darkness of measurement prejudice. What keeps metric underground is a combination of ingrained measurement nationalism and a continuing dearth of leadership on the goal, dearth except in two offices, one in Colorado and the other in Texas. But I say dearth, not absence. We at the U.S. Metric Association ARE America’s metric leaders, and will continue do be so.

    In the 1949 film,” All The King’s Men,”. a persecuted underdog gubernatorial candidate, Willie Stark (played by Broderick Crawford) receives a shotgun blast through the window of his front door. He rushes out and shouts at the darkness, “I’m gonna run! I’m gonna run even if I don’t get a single vote!” That determination lands him in the Governor’s office a few years later. USMA possesses the same tenacity as Stark, and even with the “stark” reality of incomplete SI transition in America today, we shall press on, if only one millimeter at a time, to our old national goal.

  3. P.S. In defense of good practice, and in memory of Mike Joy, my good friend and long-time Australian supporter of U.S. metrication, I am convinced that dividing meters into millimeters make much practical sense, and also has a precedent in science and healthcare. In my undergraduate laboratory work, and also across 40 years of my practicing pharmacy, liters have been divided into milliliters. Except for some kind of specialized work (which I never saw), chemists, biologists, physicians, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and the pharmaceutical industry itself, all employ milliliters to subdivide the liter. As with the quantity of length, there are only integers to deal with, and the metric system manifests its advantage to those who measure, which is all of us.

    • However, once in a while, we don’t need milliliter precision, as in the case of blood-glucose levels, which used to be given as mg/100 mL but for the past 20-30 years are given as mg/dL, which at least does illustrate the convenience of prefixes. Thus, for such levels, it is measured as milligrams per 100 milliliters = milligrams per deciliter, which is the way it has always been and will likely always will be.

      Also, the Maven writes: “The world record eyebrow hair is touted as 9 centimeters (90 millimeters for those with a refined measurement sense).”
      In this case, since the measurement apparently was not to the nearest 0.1 cm, writing it as 90 millimeters would be false precision. (Of course if it were given as, say 9.2 cm, then 92 mm would be better.)
      Thus, centimeters should be considered in such circumstances to avoid any indication of false precision; otherwise, centi-, and deci-, deka, and hecto-, should be considered as sort of “informal prefixes”…

      • If precision isn’t necessary then round your mills to the closest 5 or 0.

        You could also just move to micrograms per milliliter for densities if you wanted to avoid the dL unit.

        • Using micrograms per milliliter here would not be good because it would introduce a factor of 10. Thus, the normal blood-glucose range of approximately 60 to 120 would become 600 to 1200, which would just lead to more false precision!

          Thus, the traditional readings, whether expressed as the currently concise “mg/dL” or the former equivalent “mg/100 mL”, are just fine.

          • Are instruments not capable of measuring to the tenths of micrograms? If so mention the error bars in the form of +/- uncertainty.

            I know of machines capable of getting usable data from a blood drop. I don’t think this is unrealistic.

            • Don’t get your point! As already stated, if such were given as micrograms per milliliter, then the normal range would become from about 600 to 1200, thus obviating tenths (btw, in line with what the Maven advocates, but such is not the issue here), especially since the units from 600 to 1200 would be overly precise already!
              Wrt using a “+/- interval” here, such is totally unnecessary; even lab reports just give the patient his/her (integer) readings, accompanied by the “Reference [Normal] Interval [Range]” for comparison. (BTW, for blood-glucose levels, it’s in mg/dL; for some other things, such as APPROXIMATE platelet- counts, it is in 1000/uL.)

  4. I feel compelled to defend USMA in what at times feels like criticism of USMA for the US not having fully adopted the metric system. USMA has done a tremendous amount over the years, including the volunteer time of devoted metricationists scattered around the US, who have spent significant fractions of their lives for this cause. But USMA exists in a nation that has not fully committed itself to metric, with the government/Congress holding the key to that transition. The US can only go so far without legislation that moves us fully forward, as well as without counter legislation that undoes whatever advances are made.
    USMA, however, holds optimism that metrication of the US is inevitable; it’s just not happening as fast as most of us would like to see. Metric Today is a source of metric news, particularly pointing out the many inroads that metric has made in many industries (such as autos and farm/industrial machinery), many cases of which are being forced on us by outside pressures in an otherwise metric world. We look towards the positive, rather than pointing out all the flaws and poor usage that will always accompany any system when humans are involved.
    Even the late Pat Naughtin was an optimist, having visited the US at least twice, noting the many changes that have taken place behind the scenes, many of which the general public is unaware. Metrication has begun, it’s just far from complete, especially in the eyes of those who would like to never see a non-metric unit rear its head. We have a massive public education roadblock to overcome that’s not assisted by us waiting for a perfect system to appear.
    Also, USMA was founded to promote the US adoption of metric, not to change how the metric system is defined. There are venues for those interested in doing away with the centimeter, renaming the kilogram to eliminate the prefix in its name, enforcing kilometer pronunciation, etc. Certainly, SI is not a perfect system, but we live in an imperfect world and need to put up with the corruptions and imperfections that man always introduces into what purists would like to see perfectly applied. Not that that’s not a worthy goal, but don’t hold your breath on that one!

  5. SI-Related Acronym of Note: FAST, for Five-hundred meter Aperture Spherical Telescope, a big thing (dong-xi) being completed in China. (BTW, “dong-xi”, Mandarin for “thing”, literally means “east-west”, which would perhaps be appropriate for this 500-meter radio telescope as its east-west range will be unmatched.)

  6. Pingback: Insignificance | The Metric Maven

Comments are closed.